Related Articles
10 Comments
  • We don't know how much time it took, how many people were involved and how expansive the project is. Whenever someone pays a high price for a logo the media freaks out and people, even designers, are furious with the price tag. Why can't we be happy that a fellow creative was paid well when almost every designer complains about their work being devalued and design being sold on the cheap through spec work sites. All that being said, I think the logo looks terrible and the lion looks like traced a blind panther. 10 years ago
  • @Mehmet Reha Tugcu beat me on the answer. That's exactly what I was going to say. It is very hard to put a price on somebody else's work -firstly because each professional/studio decides how much their work is worth, secondly because we have no clue how long it took to be made, how much of a pain the client was and all that... I actually like the logo, but agree that it looks like a blind panther. 10 years ago
  • I agree with @Kelly Brito. We don't know how long it took to be created, how many, solutions have that studio/person have to provide for them. Maybe there were a lot of better logos but client choose this one. 10 years ago
  • @Mehmet Reha Tugcu and @Kelly Brito hit the nail on the head. We don't know the effort, revisions, collaboration, etc that went into it or how the stakeholders influenced the design. We also don't know if that included a release of copyright and/or licensing terms. That logo will go on thousands of jerseys, name badges, tshirts, other merch, name badges, etc. Their ability to profit off the sale of the logo on stuff is pretty high. 10 years ago
  • You also need to keep in mind just how much money these schools make off their football teams while maintaining a "nonprofit" status. Take a look at Alabama's locker room for example (that is MUCH better than many professional sports teams in the US: http://www.rolltide.com/sports/m-footbl/spec-rel/080113aao.html Or the coaches that are being paid millions of dollars every season. These schools are looking hard to spend money to maintain their non-profit statuses....have to keep that in mind when evaluating the way they spend money. All that said I think the new logo is a step back, but it's always hard to compare or meet the standards of a logo that has become iconic over the years. 10 years ago
  • I don't like the new logo. It looks like a bear, not a lion, and to me it dosen't say football team. It seems more like a logo for a hospital or something. And it won't look good in black and white. 10 years ago
  • 95% of all the clients I do consulting for are non-profit and for-profit higher education institutions. To pay $100k+ for a new logo is absurd, that money could be used to get kids into college and keep them from paying those dreadful student loans. This country has continued to dig itself into a hole that it will no longer be able to recover from without drastic changes. Paying this amount of money is a slap in the face to many kids looking to go to college but cannot afford it. It truly sickening. 10 years ago
  • I guess it all comes down to the simple fact that prices have and always will vary from creative to creative and from studio to studio. Like already mentioned, we have no idea about the team size that worked on this or time invested, so I don't think any of us are really in a place to say what was and wasn't a worth it price for the work, all we know is that somebody quoted a price and Penn State were happy to pay. 10 years ago
  • They didn't pay $128,000 for just a logo, they paid for the process and research that goes into designing a new logo for a well-known brand. The end result is a brand system, but its not like they went to 99designs and request a "panther logo for a university" and this was the result of 6 revisions. 10 years ago
  • A logo that represents a brand, which is the "customer" perception and experience of an organization or institution is invaluable if it does it's job. 128K is a fair price because the University agreed to that price. The work behind what the logo represents can be considerable and ongoing. In this case the result feels more like a high school than a pre-eminant American University. The panther is cold and aloof looking as if it were carved from stone. Not the image for a U that is trying to emerge from a PR disaster. 10 years ago