Categories / Inspiration

12 Signs Your Design Style is Out of Date

Derek Weathersbee March 31, 2021 · 10 min read

Is graphic design fun? That’s a question my colleague was asked last year, and after intense discussion we decided that it’s a strangely hard one to answer. The reason is that although it’s rewarding and edifying, it also requires you to constantly evolve and start every project like you know nothing. Otherwise, you’ll end up turning into a bitter old grump whose work looks exactly the same in twenty years.
I’ve compiled a list of signs that your design style has become dated, pulled from the trends of the past couple decades. Bear in mind that these are only symptoms, and most of us have been plagued by at least one of them. But if you check off everything on this list, it might be time to re-think the way you work.

1. Your Home Page Says “Hello. I make websites and other cool stuff.”

You probably also have a contact button that says “Let’s have a beer together.” Now don’t get me wrong: I like moving away from designer jargon, and I certainly am not opposed to beers. But the novelty of a designer who doesn’t take themselves too seriously has begun to fade. People want quality, in addition to dealing with people who are decent humans. It shouldn’t be celebrated as an added bonus that you’re not a pompous douchebag. We expect practicioners of other vocations to be humble and competent. We’re no different. So do a little courting before you plop your dirty feet up on your client’s table.
1-01

2. You Have Not Used Any Typography Created in the Last Ten Years.

Designers should be curious by nature and aware of current trends. If you fit this mold, you are likely to have found at least a handful of nice typefaces in the last decade. If your name is Massimo Vignelli, then you might get a pass on this. Otherwise, you’re either not experimenting enough (also known as being lazy) or you’re of the hyper-principled mold and would prefer that the type just carry the message, not speak it. The latter is fine, but I bet it will get old after a few years.
2-01

3. You Have Only Used Typography Created in the Last Ten Years.

There is a reason why the classics are classics. If you are only using the next trendy typeface, and do not tap into the vast pool of typography that’s existed for hundreds of years, chances are your design doesn’t have any staying power. There is no cause-effect here: using exclusively new typefaces doesn’t render your work dated. Rather, studying design history and analyzing the works that have remained timeless is something that designers must do. As the history of design as we know it is inextricably tied to moveable type, the faces that have remained in the fold for hundreds of years are surely important. Their DNA, rearranged and combined, makes up nearly all new text faces that are released. It’s worth giving the originals a whirl, especially since they’re so accessible.
3-01

4. There is an Arbitrary Pair of Crossed Lines in Your Latest Logo Design.

Here’s the odd thing about the whole hipster logo trend (a term which I realize has lost most of its meaning at this point): some of the core tenets of the Hipster Logo Manifesto are sound. Simplicity, check. Adaptabability, check. Attractiveness, check. But they still fail to accomplish the goal of a logo, which is to identify. It’s hard to identify anything if everything looks the same, which means nothing is memorable. The reason this happens, I suspect, is that most of the people creating these marks are either not schooled in how to extract the essence of a company and develop it through blue-collar tenacity, or they just choose to skip this and make something pretty.
4-01

5. You’re Using File Folder Tabs in Your Web Navigation.
Is this 2015 or 1995? There was a time when it was cool to create organizational structure on the web that resembled tangible items, like tabs and folders and folding books. But we’ve all gotten the point now that this can be done digitally, so it’s just not that cool anymore. There are plenty of mind-blowing techniques that more naturally suit the web, and which can’t be done in real life. Let’s celebrate those in the virtual world, and keep reading our musty old paper backs on the couch.
5-01

6. You Have a Photograph on Your Business Card.

This may be possible to pull off. I’ve just never seen it done. It’s not only dated, but super unprofessional. And it’s really a no-win situation that you’re putting yourself in. If you’re goofy looking, then people will say “I don’t wanna buy my insurance from this goofy-looking fella.” If you’re attractive and do the same, then people will say “I’m not gonna buy my insurance from this smug fella.” The folks whose business you really want are more concerned about what you do, not what you look like. Besides, how will you decide what typeface pairs up well with your features?
6-01

7. You Use Drop Shadows or Gradients on Type. (Or Both.)

Generally speaking, gradients and drop shadows are best left for sports or waterparks. This is one of those “just because you can doesn’t mean you should” sort of things. Yes, gradients and superfluous drop shadows often look silly and unnecessary. But it’s not just out of principle that I caution against this. In many cases, it is objectively bad to add a shadow to your text, particularly if you’re using dark text on a light background. All that shadow does is muddy up the legibility of your words. With type, you need contrast, and a fuzzy halo around your words mutes that contrast. You can certainly use shadows well, as long as they’re not a crutch, but your design should work without them, with the gradients simply adding a touch more depth. For example, a subtle and abrupt shadow behind light text can help it stand out on a dark background. Just keep your gradients in large chunks of space, and never in body copy.
7-01

8. You’re Still Using 10px Text on Websites.

Helping people go blind more quickly is no longer in style. Sorry. I was upset too when I found out. Like 7 years ago. When I was coming out of college, it seemed a pretty nifty thing to do to keep body text on the web super small, like we do on print material. The problem is that the web was never destined to be a copy of the print world, digital text is inherently tougher on the eyes, and the responsive web is here to stay. This trend seems crazy now, even looking back at my own sites from 2006 or so. Apparently I didn’t actually want people to read the things I’d spent so much time building.
So what happened to those 16-pixel H1s of yesteryear? They’re usually sitting at about 64.
8-01

9. I Have to Click on Your Animated Home Page to Enter.

In the immortal, albeit ubiquitous, words of Kimberly “Sweet Brown” Wilkins, “Ain’t nobody got time for that.” If the user has entered your URL into their browser, chances are they’re ready to view your site. Why would you want to put another step between your content and your viewers? If you’re showcasing your motion graphics abilities, you likely have legitimate examples elsewhere on your site, perhaps as part of a portfolio.
9-01

10. You Believe Swooshes are a Super Cool Addition to Your Logos.

A college instructor once told me “don’t ever put a swoosh in a logo.” I thought this was pretty dogmatic at the time. As it turns out, she was right. I’m not saying it can’t be done, but it’s one of those things that usually doesn’t turn out well because a swoosh doesn’t inherently say anything. It doesn’t say action or movement. It says “Someone showed me how to use Illustrator in 1999.” Plus, Nike has the market cornered on the abstract swoosh. So, rather than saying “don’t” – both here and in my classes – I’ll instead say “I dare you.” That is to say: if you can pull it off, great things are in your future. Sprint pulled off a rather swoosh-y mark in the last decade; theirs actually does create movement and its parts make up a greater sum. Not many others have. The solution to this is the same as for the hipsters: figure out what your client and their customers are about, write it down, scribble it, rearrange, and communicate something.
10-01

11. You Believe Oblique Sans-serif Caps are Freaking Awesome.

There is something about this style of type – besides the fact that oblique faces are mostly hideous – that just looks old. Not a good old, like Alfred Pennyworth; more like Uncle Rico – out of fashion and oblivious to it. This is often found in sports and tool brands (see Nike), but is certainly not confined to those industries. I assume the thought in most cases is that you’re make something “bigger” by capitalizing it and “faster” by skewing it. And this is not entirely unsuccessful or illogical. But lumbering type can appear slow even with a slant, just like transient skewed type feels less sturdy by nature. Most importantly, there are usually more interesting solutions.
11-01

12. You Have a Design Style.

Okay, don’t throw things at me. I too have heard people say this and scoffed at it – that “style = fart” and designers should be chameleons. I’m on board with the no-style rule only to a point, and that point is the assertion that nothing you do should be discernible as having come from your hands. That’s nonsense. Of course we are going to develop some stylistic inclinations; we’re human. That’s how we become specialized and efficient (which I don’t see as a bad thing). But if everything you do in fact does look the same – if it doesn’t distinguish your clients from each other and represent them individually – that is a problem if you want to be a designer. You might be an artist, but not a visual communicator. Designers solve problems, and problems are never built exactly the same way, so their solutions should not be either.

How Do We Avoid Dated Design?

It might seem like we have to be on eggshells constantly, worrying about whether our work has staying power. That’s partially true; we should constantly be scrutinizing ourselves and our work. But we should worry less about whether our work is trendy and more about whether we’re really fulfilling our duties as communicators. Truly evocative work is born not of trends, nor the avoidance of them, but of the persistence to create fundamentally sound, informed design. That will never become dated.


Derek Weathersbee is a designer, developer, instructor & weekend music maker. He designs for clients across the country, teaches at a local community college, and releases type at weathersbeetype.com.

Lettering Worksheets
Getting started with hand lettering?
Free lettering worksheets

Download these worksheets and start practicing with simple instructions and tracing exercises.

Download now!
About the Author
Author
Derek Weathersbee

Designer, developer, instructor & weekend music maker. I release my own on weathersbeetype.com, and some of my older design work can be seen at derekweathersbee.com, weathersbeecreative.

View More Posts
Go to My Shop
Related Articles
43 Comments
  • There's nothing wrong with file folder tabs. The majority of all modern browsers use file folder tabs in their user interfaces. Many applications use file folder tabs as well. I think it makes for a good presentation when done right in both applications and web sites. 7 years ago
  • So you're saying people dont like it when I'm a pompous douchebag ....Who would have thought it. 7 years ago
  • Sign nr. 1: you are still taking "articles" like these serious. Come on CM, I like what you do, but this is just clickbait, and not even funny. 7 years ago
  • Oh dear oh dear oh dear... this article is such a crock. 7 years ago
  • I'm just here for the Goudy Heavyface. 7 years ago
  • This reads like a list written by a designer with zero self-confidence and no personal vision. The more arbitrary parameters you set for yourself, the less you're going to be willing to push your work from mundane to radical. No swooshes! No gradients! No conversational tone! No Helvetica! Gimme a break. Don't let this clickbait mess kill your passion, folks. (And never, ever trust someone who tries to tell you that artists aren't visual communicators.) 7 years ago
  • Please add up-voting to comments. 7 years ago
  • Definitely need a voting system for comments. And articles, so that ones like this can be quickly hidden and forgotten about. 7 years ago
  • I think this article is insightful and humorous. I'm certain the author doesn't intend for these to be hard fast rules, but rather guidelines. I found the article helpful as well as entertaining. 7 years ago
  • I admit it's click bait in it's titling and ones opinion on design is always subjective, but still there are many styles which most certainly look and feel dated and potential customers pick up on these things, albeit often subconsciously but there isn't one point here I don't agree with. And Anna above??? It doesn't say "No swooshes! No gradients! No conversational tone! No Helvetica! " Anywhere. But swooshes in logos are lazy and almost always irrelevant, gradients on text are horrible, "Hello I'm quirky" is annoying and Helvetica, despite how great it is, shouldn't be your only font choice. 7 years ago
  • And the fact that Tabs are used in browsers is exactly why they shouldn't be used on desktop websites. 7 years ago
  • I think the article title should be replaced. Clients are still asking for the above styles. So we can't say that they are outdated any more 7 years ago
  • Awesome article, Thank you so much for sharing! 7 years ago
  • Perhaps the title is clickbait. In any case, it does give a clue as to what you're getting into – a necessarily subjective article, the tone and imagery of which say not everything in the article is intended to be taken as gospel. You needn't be indignant. Obviously, for example, I don't think you should avoid gradients outside of 2 arbitrary industries; I'm talking about type. Speaking of type, there is no Goudy here, but there is a deliberately campy use of Cooper Black. I did insert a couple dogmatic statements into an otherwise playful article. That's only natural, and a way of inserting some substance into the clickbait. Parameters are not a bad thing and do not kill creativity. Illogical parameters with no support are bad. I've given reasons for most of these, even if you find them to be invalid. And it's absolutely true that if you wish to have clients (the context of my "artist" statement that was taken issue at), you must pay respect to them, not simply endeavor to express yourself. (You, being human, will almost always express yourself to some degree anyway, whether you like it or not.) That doesn't preclude innovation; a good problem (often involving arbitrary parameters in client work) lends itself to a good solution. In all of this, designers should try things they're cautioned against, and go against "rules" they don't agree with. Candidly, yes, there are days on which I have little confidence, to put it mildly. Then I have days when I feel like I'm the best. Such has always been my experience as a blue-collar designer, and it's one that I share with every designer I know and respect. 7 years ago
  • So, what fonts and sizes are being used on THIS page? 7 years ago
  • Dammit, I love oblique sans-serif caps. 7 years ago
  • Some interesting points. The thing that carried the most weight with me was Uncle Rico in the header art. Also, good use of Cooper Black or Souvenir (the shittiest typefaces ever conceived, next to Zaph Chancery). Seriously good concept to illustrate dated design. 7 years ago
  • Derek, you left out the ubiquitous "shopping cart" metaphor. No self-respecting professional should have a shopping cart on their web site. I tried to renew my car registration on dmv.ca.gov. After entering all the relevant info I was invited to "add item to shopping cart." SHOPPING CART!? Is this a government agency or Walmart? (Transaction, BTW, never completed due to typical bureaucratic screw-up....) 7 years ago
  • Thank you very much for sharing such useful information! 7 years ago
  • I had a great time reading these. I actually laughed out loud many times, thinking: "SO true!!!" Thanks for the great read! :) 7 years ago
  • I think the premise of the article is valid. We should all make sure we are not dating ourselves and our work. However, when a client's corporate face is Helvetica? HELP! A good designer will solve for the client, ( even if they have to use Helvetica ) and also find ways to create current design. Now, if only a client would buy "current design". That would be sweet! Oops! Did I date myself by saying "sweet"? 7 years ago
  • Interesting read, but where's the real advice? Really a bit weak- you tell me in decent detail what I shouldn't be doing, but when it comes to solutions, it's like, erm... 'Use the Force?' 7 years ago
  • Hilarious! 7 years ago
  • I liked the article. Helpful. Entertaining. Challenging me to look more closely at my usual way of working. 7 years ago
  • To Matt above: the example you gave is actually a great one. If you have to deal with Helvetica as the corporate face, you can let your other tools work for you (color, tone, composition, language, illustration). It's actually a relief sometimes when things like that are settled – no digging for typefaces (well, unless the typeface chosen is terrible). I'm guessing by your comment, however, that I'm preaching to the choir. To Gav: Exactly what you should be doing wasn't really the point of the article, though I do understand your comment. Given a topic, I went with it and at least gave some reasoning for what was said. To lay out exactly what you should do isn't something that can be slid into another article. We spend lifetimes learning how to be designers. Now if you don't find my writing to be too "weak," perhaps you'll see more detailed, focused discourse on specific topics in later articles. One thing I haven't told you to do, and don't plan to in the future, is "use the force." A few key things though (because the fundamentals of design would take far more than a side note in a silly article): • Read, and certainly not just design books • Sketch until your fingers bleed • Keep solid company • Play guitar, dance, play sports – something outside of design If that last bit sounds preachy (a tangent, I realize), sorry. They help me, and I'm pretty successful at this. These things are what I found to be really important outside of academia, and they're things that weren't stressed in school. The art school mentality (at least in my experience) that focuses too much on self-expression is what I was addressing in my earlier comment. A balance is necessary, and that happens a lot more naturally than one might expect when you're not worried about being innovative, but solving problems in your own unique way. 7 years ago
  • This article made me smile. It also reminded me of a saying one of my coworkers used back in the 80's - "Tedium, tedium, Helvetica medium." 7 years ago
  • I agree with everything except for #7 about drop-shadows and gradients on text. Here's some simple homework: Go to a grocery store or big box retailer. Look at product packaging–I mean, really look at it. Boom. Drop-shadows and gradients, tastefully added to help determine a visual hierarchy on a box of cereal or dryer sheets. There's plenty of flat design in those marketplaces, too, but I think to totally dismiss these as "old" is to error. Also - if this is about Design (capital D) style, why all the focus on web? We spent a lot more time away from the web than on it. 7 years ago
  • I appreciate the comments, Dan. I'll say this: the homework you speak of is something I do on a daily basis, even when I don't want to. And I agree that gradients can be used tastefully; I do it all the time. I'm talking here about using it on type, body copy specifically. And while I believe I was pretty balanced in my references, I think there's a simple reason why there are more web references than you might hope for. Technologies have changed so rapidly on the web that there naturally will be design practices which show their age. 7 years ago
  • This is half the fun! Being a designer involves a constant state of curiosity and learning. The problem is, there are too many pseudo-designers out there, be they human or software-based, that knock out a logo template for 5 dollars with little consideration for the wants and needs of the client (often two different, highly contrasting things). 7 years ago
  • Excellent article! Would love to see a blog series focusing on each aspect of "don't do that, do this," on what the current contemporary trends are. 7 years ago
  • Don't forget using cheesy stock images 6 years ago
  • Chilllll everyone. In most instances, this is all true. 6 years ago
  • Spot on article. Amen to #12 6 years ago
  • Are you even a designer? This is click-bait crap! 6 years ago
  • HELVETICA.... I'm using it until I die ;-) 6 years ago
  • Nice article. I had to skip some of the topics because they were clear without even having to read them. Remember not every rule in this article are absolutes. Example the gradient drop shadow issue. They are two tools in our graphics arsenal, but must be used with good reason. The way I approach their use is to include them when there is light in my design because with light, you get shadows and gradient. The gradient colors for me must match the light color or help to produce a camera effect. So, if I am doing something flat, with no need for light, there is sometimes no need for those elements. Where some designers go wrong to is throw a drop shadow or gradient on text or object without considering what they are communicating. As the article suggest graphic design is both a communication and problem solving art. 6 years ago
  • 2. You Have Not Used Any Typography Created in the Last Ten Years. 3. You Have Only Used Typography Created in the Last Ten Years. Stopped reading 6 years ago
  • You make good points, but you don't offer many solutions. I would have liked to see proposed alternatives for tabbed navigation, for example. Many Telerik-based ASP.NET web applications still use these in 2016 and there is not really any clear alternative. I personally like tabbed navigation, but I agree it looks dated when the tabs are shaped like manila folder tabs. Wouldn't the simplest solution be removing the large border radius and using solid, flat, boxy tabs for a more modern look? 6 years ago
  • Author here. I just looked through this article again and some things struck me. The first is that this doesn't stay true to the article title...it's more just a random selection of design trends and problems that I don't/didn't love, some pretty universal and some personal. Tthat's really not what I'm about...putting my design sensibilities and convictions on others. So why'd I write it? It sounded fun. Why didn't it stick to the thesis? Probably because as I was writing (and I wasn't thinking of this at the time), I ran into the fact that there really aren't "12 Signs" about anything that indicates our validity as designers, and I veered. Don't get me wrong: a good deal of what is there is perfectly valid, particularly if you move beyond the list into the content. And I certainly would not change my tune based on some negative comments, if I fully stand by what's written. But I can't stand fully by it, as an article, because the angle it takes and the tone of it make it unhelpful for many people, and it's far too subjective. Example: obviously there's nothing wrong with oblique caps (improperly skewed caps masquerading as oblique are a bigger annoyance). I've actually used them recently. And if you can get by with a few new (or old) typefaces, do it. The point there is more: dig into type, dissect it, dork out on it, analyze its DNA. But again, it wasn't presented in the best way. For this reason – that this article really isn't a great representation of my viewpoint as a designer – I've requested the article be removed. But in case it isn't, I've left this note here. 5 years ago
  • Hate to break it to you, but it's neither 2015 or 1995. I'm guessing this is an old Out of Date, Out of Touch article. 5 years ago
  • Awesome article! animated gifs is very old style signal as well 5 years ago
  • Following their latest rebrand, I think someone should let Dropbox know about this article! 5 years ago
  • Derek - Thank you for commenting back to several readers, in a very emotionally intelligent way. After reading the first few comments, I was prepared for a childish anger-fueled rant from you, the author. Instead I was delighted to read very supportive and light-hearted responses! So thanks again and I hope others can learn how to engage in a more mature way. 4 years ago